- #FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO MOVIE#
- #FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO SOFTWARE#
- #FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO TV#
- #FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO WINDOWS#
Similarly, when we refer to “DaVinci,” we are referring to DaVinci Resolve Version 16. Related: Premiere Pro vs DaVinci Resolve: The Ultimate Battle (2022)Īs there are multiple different versions of these programs, when we refer to “Final Cut,” we are referring to Final Cut Pro X.
#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO WINDOWS#
Both DaVinci Resolve and Final Cut Pro X can be used on macOS and Windows operating systems. However, these two video editing platforms vary significantly in terms of features, tools, interface, application, and other functions. Both editing applications are top-of-the-line and can be used to edit anything from home movies, short films, commercials, to feature-length films. Letting go of what we have done in the past creates space for a new future with more possibilities.DaVinci Resolve and Final Cut Pro X are two of the most heavily used video editing platforms on the market for professionals. With tools like FCPX rethinking the problems editors and their collaborators have run into in the past, they can create a new future.
And make our jobs easier, more fun and remove old barriers,” says Beal. “If as an industry we continue to thoughtlessly dismiss bold moves like this by products like FCPX, I fear we are always going to be the last to have the tools that significantly move us forward. FCPX has rethought the problem and given editors the power to collaborate differently and with speed.įCPX isn’t about being a fantasy editing system according to Beal, “it’s about democratizing and simplifying the process for filmmakers.” With tools that make the process faster and more collaborative the job changes. An editor’s job is to be a storyteller helping the writer, director, show-runner etc.
#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO MOVIE#
He felt as though the program had stopped evolving and that he was cutting a digital movie on flatbed. Ficarra says that when he started considering FCPX he had been working with Avid editors. They wanted to work with FCPX because it was changing the game in digital filmmaking. Glenn Ficarra and John Requa writer/director duo, chose to work with FCPX for their features, Focusand Whiskey Tango Foxtrot.
#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO SOFTWARE#
Though Avid is king in Hollywood, some go rogue when choosing the editing software they want to work in.
“I believe it’s the most forward-looking NLE on the market,” Beal says of FCPX.īen Mercer editor of Unknown Solider, says in an article “Art of the Cut with Ben Mercer on editing ‘Unknown Solider’ in FCPX” that changing the tool will affect the way you approach the edit not just on the mechanical side but also with the psychological approach. With the compound clip Beal was able to put in all the music that could be offered in the scene and be able to turn each song on or off to listen through the scene with each of the music queues all without having to add a song or re-work the clip every time. He used FCPX compound clips to save hours of time during his first season on Counterpart. He also suggested using Needle Drop Auditions when transitioning between diegetic and non-diegetic equalizers. An example Beal gave was dialogue cheats where he was able to do some time stretching in audio when he was still waiting on updates from the audio editor. Through testing, Beal has shown how FCPX can be used to aid and replace Avid. “A good editor can demonstrate their value regardless of what they are cutting on, but the tools they use do matter,” Beal says. Josh Beal, an editor in Hollywood with credits ranging from Bloodline to House of Cards to Counterpart, speaks his mind on why Hollywood should reconsider its view on using FCPX.
In the nine years since the application came out many updates have been rolled out and Hollywood’s view has been stuck in 2011. Since Final Cut Pro X (FCPX) came out in April 2011, many have criticized the application saying things like, “it’s iMovie pro” or “Apple has given up on the pros,” etc. Reconsidering Final Cut Pro X in Hollywood Josh did a whole Faster Together presentation on this topic which you can find on this page. In this presentation, Josh explains why Avid Media Composer is the King of the NLE in Hollywood and what needs to happen to convince current Media Composer editors to switch over to Final Cut Pro X.
#FINAL CUT PRO X VS FINAL CUT PRO TV#
As a TV editor, Josh thinks it is time for Hollywood to reconsider Final Cut Pro X as a viable editing platform. Josh Beal is a Hollywood editor who has work on such shows as Counterpart, Bloodline, and House of Cards.
0 kommentar(er)
